Posted by Comb Over-Under on 24th September 2009

cajelaisCongrats to Erik Cajelais on taking down the  £2,500 Pot Limit Hold’em/Pot Limit Omaha Event #2 at the World Series of Poker Europe.

The Canadian poker pro made short work of the final table – doubling up and dominating in less than 3 hours. Cajelais played aggressively and knocked out Richard Gryko, Men Nguyen and Robin Keston to take the game to heads up.

Mats Gavatin, who opened the day as chip leader, lost a big pot to Cajelais early in the day and only lasted five minutes in heads up play.

It was a dominating performance, accompanied with a run of great cards and aggressive play.

To go with the bracelet, Cajelais pulled £104,677. Not bad for a brisk afternoon of poker.

Other notables in this tourney were Howard Lederer (9th for 9,117), Nikolay Evdakov and Vitaly Lunkin.

Share
Posted by Comb Over-Under on 23rd September 2009

computer-fireBuckle up, bloggers. Today is the day.

That’s right. I’ll be facing off in a multi table tourney against some of the biggest and baddest bloggers online. Watch for a full list of competitors and a live event chat thread later on today!

All that being said, I plan on winning.

Side bets? Side bets. First guy to get knocked out has to post unicorns on their site the next day. Thanks to PUNTE from WithLeather for taking the honors last time. I think it really spruced things up around there. There will also be a bounty on my head (not that any of these guys will be knocking me out).

Want to get in on future events? Send me your blog’s URL in the comments section or hit me up on CarbonPoker’s Twitter Account.

ATTN: Poker Bloggers. More of these tourneys are on the way, and we’re looking for Poker Blogs. Contact me for info on how to get involved.

Share
Posted by Comb Over-Under on 23rd September 2009

ShulmanAlthough Phil Hellmuth isn’t a member of the final table of the WSOP Main Event in November, he’s going to have a protégé hitting the felts.

Jeff Shulman, currently 4th with 19,580,000 chips, has enlisted the poker brat as a coach for the upcoming final table action. No matter what you think of Hellmuth’s antics, he’s obviously an accomplished player. With 75 in-the-money finishes through the years at WSOP events, Hellmuth also has 11 bracelets. That’s good for #1 in the industry.

Shulman thinks they have similar playing styles, and thinks he could use some pointers in short-handed play without drastically changing anything.

Don’t expect him to be a loud mouth, though. Shulman is usually a quiet player with little to say on the tables. Shulman finished in 7th place in 2000 and looks to do better than that this year. This is the 4th time he’s played at WSOP final table.

Do you think this will payoff for Shulman? If you’ve made it to the final table, you’ve got to be doing something correctly.

Share
Posted by BungalowOfCards on 21st September 2009

JP KellyYou can’t blame Fabien Dunlop for getting a little overzealous.

Having come out of relative obscurity to play to the Main Event Final Table of the World Series of Poker Europe, Dunlop was looking great going into the heads-up showdown, holding nearly a 3-1 advantage over his savvy competition, J.P. Kelly.

Presumably sweating bullets composed entirely of smaller sweat bullets, Dunlop was caught with a weak kicker early in the heads up play, allowing Kelly to suddenly double up and establish parity between the two players.

Dunlop and Kelly exchanged blows for a while, with the final major exchange coming in a nightmare scenario for Dunlop, as his suited J-2 of diamonds were thoroughly dominated by Kelly’s K-8 of the same suit.  When diamonds came on the flop the dream was truly dead, and only moments later Kelly was trying on jewelry.

Kudos to Dunlop for an impressive run—passing players like Chris “Jesus” Ferguson, who bowed out at 15th—and even more impressive £84,512 win, but especially to Kelly who has now won a WSOP bracelet on both sides of the Atlantic this year, after winning in a $1,500 Pot Limit Hold’em tournament in Las Vegas this year.

Share
Posted by Comb Over-Under on 17th September 2009

bloggersWe had a helluva time the last tournament, and this one looks to be bigger and better.

The CarbonPoker Blogger Invivational Poker tourney is back this September 23. At 7pm EST, bloggers will be squaring off in a heated battle of cards, twitter updates and smack talk.

We’re happy to bring together some of the big names of the sports blogging world to play for a $700 prizepool. Returning is last tourney’s champ, Cousins of Ron Mexico and last place disapointment, PUNTE from WithLeather.

I finished in 2nd place last time, so my prize money has been forwarded to this event — a grand total of $700. Boom! I plan on finishing in the money again, so watch for the prizepool to grow and grow.

If you’re reading this, and are outraged that you’re not a part of hit, hit me up on CarbonPoker’s Twitter account or on the comment thread of this post.

Requirements of Entry:

  • - run or contribute to an established site (5+ posts/week)
  • - send me the site’s URL
  • - send me your CarbonPoker nickname
  • - not everyone will be eligible for this tourney, but there are tons of opportunities to play and win at Carbon every day.

When’s the tournament? Thanks for asking!

When: September 23rd @ 7pm EST, 18:00 CarbonPoker Server Time. Registration will be opening 2 hours prior to the event. It starts EXACTLY at 7pm EST, so don’t be late. You’ll be locked!

Stay tuned for an updated list of bloggers, news and urrrrything else.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 7th September 2009

wsop chipsThe bulk of the World Series of Poker festivities ended a little over a month and a half ago.  And we also can’t forget that the WSOP Main Event final table still has yet to play out from November 7th to November 10th.  But Harrah’s Entertainment and the WSOP organizers have already begun announcing changes for their 2010 event.

The main change that was announced was that there will no longer be a $40,000 buy-in tournament to kick things off.  The $40k event was held mainly due to the fact that it was the 40th anniversary of the WSOP, and the tournament was very popular among certain pros – especially Vitaly Lunkin who won the event.

But as WSOP Communications Director Seth Palansky explained, it doesn’t make sense to have the event next year.  His exact words were, “The $40K was a good event.  It was a successful event.  But it made sense because it was the 40th-annual World Series of Poker.  That buy-in amount or that event doesn’t really fit when you’re not in your 40th year.”

Another event which will not be back in 2010 is the Champions Invitiational which was won by Tom McEvoy.  The initial Champions Invitational was merely part of the 40th anniversary celebration as evidenced by what Palansky said during the 2009 WSOP when he stated, “We had no intention of putting this on the schedule as a tester to see if it makes sense doing long-term.”

Seth Palansky did mention that both events could be back in the future though when he said, “Both events will probably come back 10 years from now, when we’re celebrating 50 years.  We announced them and intended them as one-off specials.”

So it definitely appears as though both events could be back one day, though it will be quite some time before that day happens.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 1st September 2009

cash_pileThere are mixed opinions on rebuy tournaments amongst the poker community.  If you ask super-aggressive players who don’t have any problem throwing money around, rebuy tourneys are the greatest thing ever to happen to poker.  Of course there is such a thing as throwing too much money around in these tournaments so it’s definitely worth taking a look at how many times one should rebuy.

One school of thought is that players should rebuy as much as possible so they always have a big stack.  And if you’ve got one of the biggest stacks, it becomes a lot easier to push other players around on the table.  Unfortunately, multiple rebuys can cause players to be careless and move all-in frequently without much thought.  This is when poker becomes gambling and all of those rebuys are wasted if you don’t make a huge cash in the end.

However, making too many rebuys has to be preferable to not making any rebuys at all which is what some people tend to do.  The reason some players do this is because they like the favorable overlays that are offered in rebuy tournaments.  But this is a huge waste of money because one is putting them self at a huge disadvantage against the other players by not rebuying.

So perhaps the best way to go in rebuy tournaments is somewhere in the middle where you plan on rebuying several times during the course of the tourney.  Doing it this way allows you to keep pace with the other players in terms of chips as well as avoid the reckless trap that some players fall into by acting as if they have unlimited rebuys.  Also, limiting yourself to a certain number of rebuys is a great way to avoid spending too much on a single tournament.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 28th August 2009

formulaYou’ve probably already heard poker pros and experts talk about how being a great player often comes down to proper money management.  But to most people, this simply means making money on the tables and avoiding the temptation to spend it gambling in the casino or partying with friends.

However, there is a much deeper meaning to money management when it comes to calculating tournament expectations.  And being able to calculate your tourney expectation is very important since it helps you determine how well you’re managing your tournament bankroll.  It’s also very useful when trying to figure out if you are playing at the right limits.

The best place to start when figuring out your tournament expectation is with the average cash.  For instance, let’s say you cashed for $2,000 over the course of the last month in 60 tournaments.  Taking $2,000/60 you would come up with an average cash of $33.33.

Of course this only shows you how much you made in tournaments where you actually cashed.  So things need to be taken a step further by figuring out how often you cash in the tournaments you play.  To find out how many times you finished in the money, simply take the number of times you cashed divided by the number of tourneys played.  Assuming you played in 300 tournaments to get those 60 cashes, the percentage of times you were in the money would be .200 (60/300) which is really good.

With this percentage you now know that you’d cash in one out of every 5 tournaments.  So the next step is to figure how much you’re spending to get each tournament cash.  To calculate these total costs, multiply the number of tournaments it takes you to cash by rake and buy-in.  Assuming you mainly play $3 + $0.30 Sit and Go’s, the formula would be 5($3 + $0.30).  After doing the math you’ll find that your average cost would be $16.5 to get each cash.

The final step to calculating tournament expectation is subtracting your average cost from the average cash and then dividing it by the number of tournaments it takes you to cash.  In this example, the formula would be ($33.33 – 16.5)5 and the answer would be $3.36.

So, after doing more math than most people care to do, your tournament expectation would be a $3.36 profit for every tourney you play.  And anybody can find out their tournament expectation as long as they keep track of their buy-ins, number of tourneys played, number of cashes, and amount of money made.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 26th August 2009

poker1-main_FullNobody likes buying into a poker tournament only to bust out a few minutes later.  Yet this happens a lot in Sit & Go’s because players don’t know a whole lot of strategy for how to play the beginning stages of the tournament.  That is why it’s so essential to have a plan for how you’ll navigate through the beginning parts of a Sit & Go.

The first thing you need to employ in your plan is that there is no rush to double up in the beginning.  Many players think differently as they try to go all-in ASAP in an effort to take all of somebody’s chips.  But you should never try to force an all-in call just for the sake of doubling up.

Instead, you should play conservative in the beginning so that you avoid all of the maniacs who have no regard for their tournament buy-in.  If you happen to land A-A and somebody wants to go all-in pre-flop, then by all means put them to the test.  But other than these kinds of situations, you should be wary of jumping into the heavy action too early.

Just remember, you’ve got a whole tournament to be aggressive so don’t get stuck trying to prove something in the early going.

Another thing to be mindful of in the beginning stages of a Sit & Go is playing your position right.  This should go without saying since nearly every player knows the basics of playing early, middle, and late position.

But you should play even more conservatively in early position during a Sit & Go since your chip stack is finite.  In other words, you can’t just add more to it once the stack starts dwindling like in a cash game.  The best strategy for early position is scaling back your starting hand requirements so that you aren’t playing dominated hands like A-Q.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 18th August 2009

cash_pileMost amateur poker players have one criterion when picking the cash games they play in: are there any open seats?  And this is a major reason why they will always remain amateurs.  So for those who want to come out winners in cash games over the course of their poker days, it is essential to add a little more thought to picking which cash games to play.

The first thing you need to look at when picking a cash game to play in is simply what poker variation you wish to play.  Of course this decision is not as easy as one would expect since there are lots of different variations which include everything from Texas Hold’em and Omaha to Crazy Pineapple.  The best way to figure out which variation is right for you is to keep track of the results you have in each one.  This will require logging some time in the different variations so just play low limits for a while until you figure this out.

Another important factor in choosing cash games is to find a limit you’re comfortable with.  As stated before, begin in the lower limits to figure out what game is best for you, and then move up limits depending on how you’re doing.  Remember though that you should ideally have at least 300 big blinds in your bankroll before choosing to settle at a particular limit.

Getting into more specifics when choosing cash game tables, the kind of table you’ll be sitting down at is crucial as well.  Depending on whether you’re a loose or tight player, table dynamics will affect your success greatly.  Luckily, poker rooms make it easy to find out if tables are loose or tight since they give statistics on average pot size in addition to what percentage of players are seeing the flop.  Obviously, bigger pots and more players seeing the flop means that the table will be looser.

One last element to look at when choosing a cash game is what types of players you will be playing against.  At loose tables, you’ll encounter plenty of players who will make frequent raises, or even go all-in in No-Limit games.  And if you’re uncomfortable with this then a tighter table where the pots are smaller will be your best bet.  On the other hand, if you hate waiting around for big pots and players who only play premium hands then the loose table should be your top choice.

Once you’ve figured out these four elements, you should be ready to pick the cash game which best suits you.

Share