One of the stranger moves in the poker strategy realm involves buying into cash games with far less than the minimum stack size allowed. For example, if you’re playing at a standard cash game table where the max buy-in is 100bb, some players will buy in with 20bb-40bb. The thinking is that the bigger stacks will assume you’re a fish, and give you a lot more action on any good poker hands you come across.
Expanding on this thought, a lot of big stacks immediately feel they have an advantage over the smaller stack, and will make big raises in late position just because they think they can push this supposed noob off of a hand. Assuming you’re the short stack and holding a great hand in this situation, your short stack strategy would work to perfection if the opponent has marginal holdings.
However, you also have to consider the other side of the coin, which is that you won’t be able to steal frequently or maximize value on the nuts when you are shortstacking in cash games. This alone is one big reason why most players won’t buy in for any less than the maximum amount in a cash game.
So in the end, is it worth playing as a short stack just to potentially get more action on good hands? In most cases, you’re better off going with the bigger stack – although some poker players actually do better with a short stack. Assuming you aren’t experiencing a whole lot of success with a max buy-in and you like to play tight while waiting for premium hands, perhaps shortstacking is worth a try for you.
Just make sure that you don’t get overly-aggressive with your little stack though since plenty of big stacks will be trying to bust you.














