Posted by PokerPop on 29th February 2012

Gavin Griffin will always hold the dubious distinction of being the first player ever to win an EPT, WPT and WSOP title. Griffin completed poker’s triple crown in 2008, when he added a WPT Borgata Winter Open victory to his 2004 WSOP $3k PLO and 2007 EPT Monte Carlo titles. Since then, other players like Bertrand Grospellier, Jake Cody and Roland De Wolfe have also joined the triple crown club, but Griffin will always be the first.

The days of his triple crown achievement must seem like ages ago because Griffin is just like the millions of other low stakes grinders out there trying to make a living with the game. He blogged about this at Cardplayer by writing the following:

It’s my first time in this poker room with the beach murals on the walls. I came here to avoid familiar faces. I’m embarrassed. 2011 shattered many of my dreams and most of my ego. I was in a bad place mentally all year and that made for some bad decisions in my poker career. I managed my bankroll poorly and by the end of the year was playing some uninspired poker. I need to find a way to fix this. So, I’ve decided to drop down in limits, fix my game, and rebuild.

It must be odd for a man who’s earned $4,634,067 over his live poker tournament career to be sitting with the average Joe Grinder at some unassuming poker room. But it’s also refreshing to know that Griffin isn’t like some of the other poker pros who would just as quickly avoid the game after going broke, rather than drop down to lower stakes and grind their way back to the top.

In any case, you can take a nice piece of advice out of Gavin Griffin’s journey back to the top since he listed some very important questions that he asks himself after every session:

1. How well did I control my emotions?
2. Everyone makes mistakes, but did I learn from the mistakes I made?
3. Did I game and seat select aggressively?
4. Did I honestly evaluate my mental state and energy level?
5. Did I go on “auto pilot” at any point or did I actively think about decisions?

The game is tougher today than Griffin’s glory days of the mid-2000′s. However, poker is still beatable for those who put the work in, and it sounds like Griffin has committed himself to doing what it takes to reach the top again.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 28th February 2012

While your overall skill level is obviously important when it comes to poker profits, table selection is just as important in cash games. After all, if you’re playing on a table full of solid regulars, it’s extremely tough to make any money.

As most people know, basic table selection calls for looking at the flopped-viewed percentage; generally speaking, the higher the flopped-viewed percentage, the more loose fish seeing the flop. However, just about everybody knows this, so it’s important to consider a couple of other factors too.

Assuming you don’t have a heads-up display, it will probably take around 40-50 hands to assess how good the table is you choose. You can play ABC poker while profiling your competition so as not to lose any major money. While you’re assessing opponents, some general signs of fish/novice players include those who open-limp, and players who buy into a cash game with less than the allowed 100 big blinds.

Open-limping is rarely a good play because it not only shows weakness in one’s hand, but you’re likely to get raised by a skilled player later in the hand. In regards to buying into games with less than 100bb, this is usually a mistake because you can’t maximize your advantage with great hands (in No-Limit). This being said, there are players who purposely play short-stacked in cash games to create a certain table image; however, the average short-stacker isn’t a good player.

One final point worth mentioning here is that if you can’t spot at least one poor player on the table after playing 40-50 hands, it’s a smart idea to move on to another table. It also helps if you play the same stakes at the same time of day so you get a good feeling for the regulars – this makes separating regs from fish much easier.

Share
Posted by CarbonPoker on 27th February 2012

Today’s televised poker tournaments, featuring Texas Hold ‘em, have brought to our cultural conscience names like Danny Nguyen, Phil Hellmuth and Tom Dwan. Long before playing poker for money became a national spectator sport, the game was best known in the confines of smoke-filled saloons in the Old West. If viewers think that today’s contests can be a bit chippy, they would have been riveted by the way the poker legends of Yesteryear handled their business – especially if someone was perceived to have cheated. Enjoy this list of some of the baddest hombres ever to say the words “deal” and “draw”.

7. Luke Short. Although he has was associated (as a gambler) with some of the most notorious pistoleros in Old West history, like Wyatt Earp and Bat Masterson, Luke Short’s reign was strictly as a gambler. From Deadwood to Tombstone, he practiced his craft, and money had a way of finding its way into his hands. Before he was through, he would be part owner of the Palais Royale Saloon in Fort Worth, Texas, his last gig before dying of Dropsy in Gueda Springs, Kansas in 1893.

Luke Short

 

6. “Canada” Bill Jones. Born in the early 1800s, Bill Jones got his nickname by moving to Canada when he was 20 years old. However, it was in places like New Orleans (where the first casino poker games were held) where he earned his reputation as a gambler. “It is immoral,” he famously said, “to let a sucker keep his money.” Jones also gained notoriety as a cheater at everything from cards to horse racing.

Canada Bill Jones

 

5. William Barclay Masterson. Once upon a time in the Old West, a pair of ne’er-do-wells named Jack Black and The Sanctimonious Kid (you can’t make this stuff up) went to a high-stakes poker game in Denver, hoping to rob the table blind the old fashioned way – with their guns. The robbery never went down, though, even though they had gotten in the door. When the Kid was later asked why he had changed his mind, he explained that “Bat” Masterson was sitting at the table, and he knew they would both be dead before their guns ever cleared their holsters. He was probably right. Masterson’s reputation as a poker player was exceeded only by his reputation as a gunfighter.

William Barclay Masterson

 

4. John Wesley Hardin. Whatever his level of skill as a poker player, Hardin is widely considered to be the deadliest man in the Old West – the old-time equivalent to a complete and utter sociopath. By the age of 15, the tough Texan had to leave his hometown a fugitive after killing first a former slave of his uncles and then the authorities who arrived to arrest him for it. Hardin even killed people accidentally, like Charles Cougar, who was asleep in the room above Hardin when he fired his pistol to disrupt a man’s snoring in the next room. He was willing to take as much as he gave – in one wild poker game, he was blasted with a shotgun by a gambler named Phil Sublett.

John Wesley Hardin

 

3. Wyatt Earp. Although history notes Earp as more of a lawman-turned-gunfighter than a card player, he spent many long evenings at the same poker tables as Doc Holliday, and he was not accustomed to losing at cards. In fact, it was his tough approach as a keno dealer in Wichita that led law enforcement to seek out his services as a lawman. Earp lived a long life, dying in Los Angeles in 1929. Along the way, he crossed paths (and played poker) with the likes of not just Holliday, but also famed gunman Bat Masterson.

Wyatt Earp

 

2. James Butler Hickok. “Wild Bill”, as he became widely known, was definitely an Old West figure who earned reputations for both gunfighting and gambling. Long after he had dispatched fellow gambler and shootist Phil Coe in the streets of Abiline, Wild Bill got his when young Jack McCall shot him in the back of the head while he was playing what he must have felt was a pretty decent hand at the time, forever to be known as the Dead Man’s Hand: Eights and Aces. Whereas Hickok’s disagreement with Coe had been over a woman, it was McCall who had lost big across from the gunman at the poker table the night before.

Wild Bill

 

1. John Henry Holliday. “Doc” Holliday will always be linked to his friend Wyatt Earp because he was with the Earps (Morgan and Virgil along with Wyatt) during the Shootout at the OK Corral in the silver boomtown of Tombstone, Arizona. Earp himself described Doc as “the most skillful gambler and nerviest, speediest, deadliest man with a six-gun I ever knew.” Doc didn’t gamble for fun; it was his profession, even though he was an accredited dentist. When he wasn’t playing poker, he was playing Faro. Either way, he left a trail of bodies in his wake (including that of poor Ed Bailey, who got it wiht the knife), and made money all the while. On his way to Tombstone, in Prescott, he earned some $40,000 playing cards… Maybe they were afraid to lose to him!

Doc Holliday

 

 

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 27th February 2012

Last month, we discussed how high stakes poker pro Phil Galfond was planning to sell his New York City condo. But an update is in order because his condo has officially been put on the market at a sale price of $3,990,000.

The primary reason for the $4 million price tag is its Greenwich Village location, which is one of the pricier areas of New York City. It’s also worth mentioning that Galfond is selling the property at a higher price than he originally bought it for ($3.14 million) since he did some updates on it.

The biggest update is that Galfond took the two condos he purchased, and combined them into one big unit. In addition to this, he also installed a slide that goes from the upstairs to the downstairs – although this is unlikely to boost the final sale price. If you’re wondering about some of the main points of this property, the Core Group, which is selling the condo, wrote about some of the major aspects with the following:

This convertible 4-bedroom, 4-bathroom home with over 2,400-square feet is accessed through a private keyed elevator. Features include a media/game room, home office, 18-foot double height atrium, two large glass walled terraces, a private roof deck, along with a beautiful Italian-made Rintal staircase, as an alternative way down to the first floor.

As we mentioned in our last post about Phil Galfond selling his NYC place, the primary motivation for the sale is that he’s living in Vancouver and not using it. He said, “I’m not living there, nobody’s living there. And I considered renting it out, but I don’t really like the idea of someone in my space if I’m gonna be back there. And I realize that I don’t really know if I’m gonna be back there.”

If you watch much TV keep a look out for Galfond’s condo when it appears on the Home & Garden TV show Selling New York.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 25th February 2012

Jerry Yang will always hold a special place in poker lore since he won the 2007 WSOP Main Event along with $8.25 million. In addition to this, he’s also respected by some poker players for his pleasant attitude and charitable contributions. However, in the four-plus years since his WSOP victory, Yang has failed to do anything truly significant on the felt.

But this isn’t such a big deal to movie producers since Yang told Short Stacked Radio that his life story could be made into a movie. He told host Mark Hoke, “Between you and me … my father and I will be meeting with a motion picture company in about three weeks or so to discuss the opportunity to have the book made into a motion picture,”

He continued talking about the movie by saying, “I’m very excited and I’m praying, I’m really praying right now. Hopefully that will happen. We have a scheduled meeting already. My father and I will fly out and meet with this particular company. This is my third meeting with them by the way, so hopefully we’ll be able to put something together that is agreeable with both sides.”

Now when most people think about Jerry Yang, they only consider that he won the 2007 WSOP Main Event. However, his back story is actually quite interesting since it includes escaping communist Laos in the 1970′s and fleeing to Thailand. While in Thailand, Yang’s family was forced to stay in a refugee camp, where his brother and sister both died.

Based on his tough beginnings and rise to prominence in the poker world, it certainly appears that Yang’s life would make a good movie. Furthermore, there’s already a book called All In that was written about the current Californian, so producers have plenty of material to go off of.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 24th February 2012

One concept that’s rarely discussed with regards to poker strategy is how you should start a multi-tabling session. The biggest dilemma most players have here is whether to open all of their poker tables right away, or slowly ease their way in by opening one table at a time.

This all comes down to preference because some players need to “warm-up” at the beginning of a session, while others feel comfortable opening the typical number of tables they play right away. For example, if you normally play 6 poker tables at once, you can open all six as long as it doesn’t affect your decision making.

Of course, there’s nothing forcing you to open the maximum amount right away, and it’s not going to kill your profits if you don’t have all six tables open.

Furthermore, you don’t have to play the max number of tables when you’re having trouble concentrating during a lengthy session. After all, not everybody can maintain their maximum focus throughout the whole multi-tabling session. Some days you just won’t have it, and you might do a lot better by dropping the amount of tables you play by two or three.

Before you jump into a multi-tabling session, it’s also helpful to get into a routine such as looking over hand histories or poker strategy articles. Doing so can put you in the right mind frame to play poker and have a successful session. This is especially the case with hand histories since you can pick up some tips on where you went wrong during certain hands, and improve on them in the upcoming session.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 22nd February 2012

After you’ve been playing poker at the same stakes for a while, defining a general playable range of hands becomes much easier. Sure this range will change depending upon what’s happening at your specific table, but you’ll at least have a good idea about what hands are okay to play from each position.

Doing this same thing in heads-up poker can be a little trickier if you’re not totally experienced in HU play. For one thing, your opponent’s average holdings will be much weaker, so you need to be more aggressive with marginal hands. In addition to this, you can’t just sit around waiting for excellent hands to come because you’re either paying the small or big blind every hand. That said, let’s address the challenges heads-up players face by looking at some general HU cash game and tournament advice.

Heads-up Tournament Play

If you’re heads-up with another player in a MTT or SNG, chances are that the blinds are pretty significant at this point. So the first thing you need to consider is how you and your opponent’s chip stacks measure up to the blinds. For example, if you and your opponent each had 200,000 chips and the blinds are at 10,000/20,000, you’d both have 10 big blinds. Now this doesn’t give you a lot of room to work with, so you’re going to need to shove as well as call shoves with marginal hands.

A decent guideline to consider in this situation is to shove with Ax, Kx, Q4+, J9+, T9+, 98+ and 22+. As for calling shoves, you should look to do so with Ax, Kx, Q6+, JT+ and 22+. If you’ve got far more big blinds than what we discussed before, you can afford to be a little more conservative in your range of playable hands. Furthermore, you won’t have to do as much shoving since the blinds aren’t as critical.

Heads-up Cash Game Play

Heads-up cash games are a lot more relaxed when it comes to how aggressive you need to play. After all, if your stack drops considerably, you can always rebuy and stay in the game. This being the case, there won’t be nearly as much shoving in HU cash games.

Unfortunately, it’s a lot harder to define any guideline for how you should play HU cash because this all depends on your opponent. For instance, if you’re playing against an extremely loose-aggressive player, you’d want to open both the range of hands you raise with as well as the range you’d be willing to call with.

A guideline for raising hands against a maniac cash game player include A4+, K6+, Q7+, J8+, 97+, 87+ and 22+. Hands you could call raises with include A6+, K8+, Q9+, J9+, T8+, 98+ and 22+. But again, this is just general advice, and the range of playable cash game hands will all depend on what you’ve seen from your opponent.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 21st February 2012

People often make a big deal about Doyle Brunson playing poker at the age of 78. However, most of these same people have never heard of Andy Amatrudo who is old enough to be Brunson’s dad.

The 103-year-old has been playing poker since he was in third grade and still enjoys the game today. Amatrudo spoke about his nine-plus decades of experience by saying, “Ever since I was eight or nine years old I used to play on the steps, for cards, marbles and cigarettes.”

His game of choice is Seven Card Stud, and the South Philadelphia native loves to play at the Trump Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City. Perhaps the word “love” is an understatement because he rarely misses a day at the poker tables. Amatrudo expanded on this thought by saying, “The Taj Mahal, to me, is my second home. I’ve lived next door and I’m here every day, seven days a week.”

Tom Gitto, who is the Taj Mahal Poker Operations manager, also talked about how frequently Amatrudo is found at the casino by mentioning, “If he’s missing they’ll call him up and they’ll call us and say ‘hey, where’s Andy?’ Everybody starts looking for that red flag on his scooter to come scooting in the room.”

Seeing as how he’s such a fixture at this Atlantic City venue, Andy Amatrudo celebrated his 103 years on Earth by visiting the Taj Mahal poker room. While at his birthday party, Amatrudo said, “I want to thank my relatives. I’m very proud of them all.” He also gave his secret to longevity by adding, “I say my prayers every day to god to keep me healthy. That’s my secret.”

Hopefully there will be several more birthday celebrations for Amatrudo at the Trump Taj Mahal.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 20th February 2012

While it may not have quite the anticipation of a Floyd Mayweather/Manny Pacquiao bout, a potential fight between Andrew Feldman and Dan Cates is currently drawing some interest in the poker world. These successful high stakes poker pros are currently in the midst of talking over the fight as the following tweets were sent:

(Cates) So you still want to do the fight? Let’s schedule for this WSOP perhaps? #Ringmatch

(Feldman) Sure let’s do it! #hu4rollz

As you can see, details of the fight aren’t exactly plentiful, other than the fact that the 2012 WSOP is being considered as a potential stage. Neither Feldman nor Cates is particularly intimidating from a physical standpoint, and they don’t have any martial arts training to speak of either, so it’s hard to predict a winner here. This being said, we can only hope that Cates and Feldman learn some actual fighting skills for whatever sport they plan on battling in.

The only other recent fight between poker players we can cite was the one last year involving Lex Veldhuis and Bertrand Grospellier. These two went all-out after spending $30k to rent a ring in Marbella, Spain and have the kickboxing match taped. The action was about what you’d expect from two poker players who weren’t dedicated martial artists. Veldhuis had done a little kickboxing in the past, which is not to say that the experience truly shined in the ring. However, he was able to beat Grospellier after knocking him out with a kick to the head in the second round.

It’s doubtful that the fight between Andrew Feldman and Dan Cates will even be as good as the Veldhuis/Grospellier match. But if it does happen, it will at least provide a little side entertainment during the WSOP.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 18th February 2012

After a relatively uneventful debut in Africa last year, it appears as if WSOP officials are trying to shake things up by naming Scotty Nguyen as host for the 2012 WSOP Africa. This event will run from February 21st-26th in Johannesburg, South Africa, and it’ll include 6 ring tournaments.

From a pure playing standpoint, the Prince of Poker seems like a good choice to host the ceremonies since he’s won 5 gold bracelets in addition to $11.4 million in live poker tournaments. Nguyen is very excited about hosting this event and he was quoted as saying, “You know, the Prince has been all over the world baby. You name it: Australia, Asia, Europe, but this is my first time going to South Africa, and I’m so excited to come out and share this great game we love with the players there…to get to know them and to just have a good time baby.”

Nguyen continued his speech by adding, “Just make sure the people at the Emerald protect me from any lions, and I promise you we’ll have a lot of fun baby!” It’s more plausible that the people at Emerald Casino need to protect Nguyen from the cocktails because he’s well known for his drunken rants at the poker table.

Few people forget the incident in the 2008 WSOP $50,000 H.O.R.S.E. tournament where he berated Michael Demichele throughout much of the final table. And while viewers weren’t shown the entire story where other players were getting Nguyen fired up, the YouTube clip of this event has definitely cost him some credibility.

Hopefully, Scotty Nguyen can stay sober and coherent throughout most of his time hosting this event. If not, well…at least we’ll have some more fun clips to watch of his drunken debacles.

Share