Posted by PokerPop on 31st December 2010

In today’s overly-aggressive poker world, four betting is pretty common. And in most cases, the person who four bets has a pretty good hand. However, hand strength is only one factor that goes into making the decision to four bet. So in the spirit of four betting, here are 4 tips that will help you decide whether or not to make that fourth bet.

Your Cards

As mentioned before, this is the easiest way to decide if you four bet or not. When an opponent three bets you, then you have to consider the possibility that they’re willing to go all-in with a fifth bet if you four bet. Obviously, you need to keep the board texture in mind too in addition to your cards, which is where the next tip comes into play.

Opponent’s Range

A fourth bet doesn’t always indicate a strong hand. In fact, many overly-aggressive players use the fourth bet to intimidate their opponent into folding. This is why it’s important to put your opponent on a range throughout the hand. Also consider what they’re thinking when they make the third bet. Do they think you’re a tight player who would probably fold if you don’t have the nuts? If so, their range is going to be wider.

Likelihood that your Opponent will fold

Another thing you need to think about is if your opponent will fold to a fourth bet. Assuming you don’t have the nuts, you’re probably hoping they fold. Their table image will play a large part in this, but so will the pot odds you’re giving them, which leads us to the last tip on four betting.

Price to Call

If you only make a $15 four bet in a $200 pot, you’re not going to push an opponent out of the hand. After all, they’ve already invested plenty into the hand, and their pot odds are almost forcing them to call. However, if you make a $100 raise into a $200 pot, you’ve given the opponent something to think about. So always keep in mind the price you’re giving an opponent to call when you four bet.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 30th December 2010

Anytime you attack the all-time leader in WSOP bracelets by entitling a book “Don’t Listen to Phil Hellmuth,” you’re bound to draw some criticism from the poker community. Dusty Schmidt is finding this out the hard way since numerous websites and blogs are attacking him for writing such a book with no bracelets of his own. Well Schmidt has taken in all of the criticism regarding his book, and responded with a blog post. Here is some of what Schmidt wrote in the recent post:

When you put a book out into the world which in turn leaves you pretty vulnerable since you know that if you make even one mistake or you explained even one concept improperly, you are going to get crucified.

The articles about the book I find most laughable are the ones that go something like this,“Who does this Schmidt kid think he is? How dare he question the champ. How many bracelets does this kid have anyway? ZERO. And he’s telling a guy with 11 that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about?” Those ones always make me laugh. I think what many are forgetting is that this is a no limit holdem cash game book. This has nothing to do with tournaments whatsoever. Sure, the cash game advice will apply very well in the early stages of tournaments when stacks are deep, but the fact that Phil has won 11 bracelets and that somehow means he knows more than me about no limit holdem cash games, well, that doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense to me.

The bottom line is this. I play cash games and Phil plays tournaments, for the most part. We both sometimes play each others games, but we both definitely fall into two separate categories as players. Writers can speculate all they want. That is their job and they are good at it. I have no problem with that. But if Phil was really a great cash game player and thought I wasn’t any good, we’d be playing heads up. Because there is no way a poker player is going to pass up on playing big stakes against someone else who they thought was far inferior. I would never turn down an offer to play someone I was substantially better than in a high stakes HU match and neither would Phil. I haven’t gotten any messages as far as I can tell about any offers to play Phil and you can guarantee I won’t. And that’s pretty much all anyone needs to know to figure out this whole debate. Because I know that’s sure not a match I would run from.

As much as Schmidt has attacked Hellmuth as a player, it would be nice to see the Poker Brat come back and challenge Schmidt to some heads-up Hold’em. Unfortunately, I agree with Schmidt and don’t think Hellmuth will take any time away from his busy schedule of doing music videos and sending out Twitter posts about Dancing with the Stars for such a challenge.

Share
Posted by Ray Finkle on 30th December 2010

My oh my, what a year it has been for poker in 2010. We recently revisited the past 12 months like the Ghost of Poker Past, looking back at the good, the bad, and the ugly. (Seriously, men cross-dressing in female bracelet events?) A Canadian Main Event champ who defied all odds as he climbed back from just $5,000 chips on day 4, “The Grinder” and his career-defining year to remember, Annie Duke winning the NBC National Heads-Up Championship, the ups and downs of poker legislation, all four Mizrachi brothers cashing the Main Event–these are just some of the things that come to mind when I reminisce. They are all pale in comparison to 2010′s major headline: the undeniable presence of World Series of Poker (WSOP) bracelets, their presumably broke owners, and their auctions on eBay.

It was a stunning story when T.J. Cloutier christened the year in January with the auction of his 2005 $5,000 No-Limit Hold’Em event bracelet. The once illustrious gatekeeper of the felt had apparently fallen upon hard times, as speculation swirled around the poker community as to what exactly had become of Cloutier when his bracelet appeared on the chopping block for a Vegas pawn shop’s eBay listing. All signs pointed to the craps tables as the culprit, an unrelenting addiction which had helped his fortune and fame diminish faster than drugs and alcohol combined. A man, who at the pinnacle of his career earned himself the title of having the most WSOP cashes, would see his bracelet sell for $4,006, a mere spec in the sun of the empire he had squandered.

The stigma surrounding Cloutier wore off quickly though when it was realized the he was just the beginning of the latest trend befalling the poker industry. We looked previously at the auctions of Paul “Eskimo” Clark’s 1997 $1,500 Razz bracelet (selling for $4,050) and the 1999 Pot-Limit Omaha bracelet of Hassan Kamoei (which received no bids at the close of the 10-day auction and the $3,800 starting price). It is interesting to note that Kamoei won his bracelet by outlasting a table that included Clouter. While Doyle Brunson is known as the “Godfather of Poker” for his influence on the game, in light of this year’s overwhelming display of busto and his apparently deep roots at the center of it all, Cloutier can now be referred to as “The Godfather of Broke.”

Peter Eastgate’s 2007 Main Event bracelet was the only auction from 2010 not sold for financial gain and was a news headline in of itself. Earlier in the year, he announced his retirement from poker, and his bracelet auction was a way to help further remove himself from a lifestyle that had grinded him into the ground. All the proceeds of his auction went on to benefit UNICEF, in what turned out to be a noble swan song for Eastgate from the felt.

What better way to close out the year but with another bracelet for sale on eBay, this time belonging to Brad Daugherty. As the year has progressed, the names of the owners behind these auctions has grown increasingly more obscure, highlighted by Kamoei and now Daugherty, which is sad considering he is a previous Main Event champion. Not just any Main Event: he is the first ever winner of a Main Event prize worth $1 million. Considering the names of other winners and their staying power from the same 10-year span (Mortensen, Ferguson, Seed, Nguyen), it was a victory that would only serve to shadow him for the rest of a career highlighted by comparably insignificant grinding that brought in winnings at a decimal and a fraction of that life-changing score.

The bracelet, inscribed with the bulbous name “BRAD” on the front, was made from 96 grams of 14K gold at a time when bracelets knew nothing of diamonds, a scrap value of $2,484.50 at current exchange rates. All things considered, it would go on to reach $30,100 by auction’s end, a modest amount that wasn’t enough to trigger Daughtery’s reserve price. For a man down and out and a piece of jewelry adorned with an inscribed name that sticks out like a cold sore, you’d think holding high standard would be the last thing somebody would be doing.

The stunning influx of all these auctions in the past year has almost become comical to the point where it’s insulting to the legacy of the WSOP and the achievement of taking down an event. There is nothing admirable about having worked your entire life to achieve the status of “bracelet winner” then frivilously spending all your winnings and putting yourself in a position to be nil back at square one. The saying “that’s poker” doesn’t apply here, because it isn’t as much of an issue of a coin flip as it is just common sense and personal restraint. Here’s to hoping 2010 was both the beginning and the end to the eBay trend and that bracelets will be staying on wrists and in trophy cases where they belong.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 29th December 2010

We’ve covered putting an opponent on a range before, but you can never spend too much time learning to profile your opponents’ hands. With that in mind, here are a few specific things you should look at when putting your opponent on a range.

Opponent’s Table Image

You should always consider what type of opponent you’re up against when defining a range; a simplified way to do this is by profiling players as tight, loose or somewhere in between. Tight opponents are the best to pin to a range because they don’t play as many cards. Loose players, on the other hand, play a wider range of cards so you’ll have to work harder when putting them on a range.

Opponent’s Table Position

Once you’ve profiled how an opponent plays, you can use their table position to further narrow hand ranges down. Looking at table position is especially important pre-flop because this is when you can really get a read on what range other players have. For instance, if a tight player raises from early position, you can assume they have a premium hand such as AA through JJ, AK. If a loose player raises from early position, you could assume that their range is extended to AA through TT, AK (possibly even 99 and AQ).

Board Texture

As the hand moves to the flop and beyond, the board is going to play a big part in narrowing an opponent’s range. For example, if a straight draw was in your opponent’s range and three cards to a straight are on the board, you have to consider that they hit a straight. Now in some cases, you might think an opponent is bluffing; however, if you’ve put them on a range all along, you’ll have a better idea as to whether or not they’ve actually hit the hand.

Betting Patterns

One more good thing to look at when putting opponents on a range is betting patterns. By factoring in position, table image and board texture, looking at betting patterns completes the puzzle. For example, if an opponent calls your raises throughout a hand, then suddenly re-raises after the board shows a flush, you can assume they’ve hit a flush.

As with anything in poker, you can never be 100% sure about what your opponent’s range is; instead, you’re just making an educated guess. But keep in mind that these educated guesses are a lot more helpful than taking random chances when it comes to knowing what an opponent has.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 28th December 2010

Pocket queens is definitely one poker hand that makes players smile inside when they look down at their hole cards. But as with any pocket pair, pocket queens are fairly vulnerable after the flop, which means you need a plan when playing them.

The first thing you need to realize with pocket queens is that there is only a 1 in 110 chance that somebody else has a better hand pre-flop. So you should raise and/or re-raise to narrow the amount of opponents to just one; the purpose of this is to avoid letting multiple drawing hands into the pot that could hit a straight or flush.

Once the flop is dealt, you need to look at what cards are on the board as well as your table position. In most cases, you aren’t going to flop a set; but if you do, you can value bet an opponent to begin taking their stack. When you don’t flop a set, which is the large majority of the time, you need to put your opponent on a range. There won’t be much information for you on the flop, but you’ll gather enough info on the turn and river to make an informed decision.

Also keep in mind that the size of your chip stack and table image will determine your success with pocket queens. With a tight table image and huge chip stack, you may not get any action on a big pre-flop raise; however, you might be able to make an opponent fold on the flop with a big raise even if the board completely misses you.

In the end, you need to realize that playing pocket queens is more than just playing the hand street by street. Your entire play up to this point could be the difference between taking someone’s stack or just having them fold.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 27th December 2010

There is no one-size-fits-all strategy for re-buy poker tournaments because there is no one-size-fits-all re-buy tournament. There’s tournaments with re-buys in the first hour, tourneys with unlimited re-buys and re-buy freerolls; you need a different strategy for each one of these tourneys too.

For re-buy tournaments that only offer re-buys in the first hour, the strategy is pretty simple. These tourneys allow you to add on after your chip stack falls below the starting amount, so you want to play unraised hands in the beginning and add on after your stack is below the starting amount. Just make sure that you don’t risk too much in big hands during the first hour so you can keep adding on and remain one of the chip leaders.

In unlimited re-buy tournaments, you need to play a wide range of hands and raise whenever you’re given a reason to. Small pairs (or better), overcards and suited cards with a J or better are all good pre-flop hands to play. Be sure to raise often and sniff out those who are being reckless just because the tourney offers unlimited re-buys. Also, keep your amount of re-buys to five or six; at some point, you need to cut your losses and quit playing so you don’t have to make the final table just to break-even.

Freeroll re-buy tournaments are nice because players don’t always re-buy seeing as how it’s a freeroll. This means you can gain a huge advantage just be re-buying in the freeroll. Assuming the freeroll has something like a $1,000 prize pool and first place gets $200 of this money, it’s certainly worth re-buying even if it takes $20. And if you don’t make your money back, just consider it a regular tournament buy-in where you didn’t cash.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 26th December 2010

Phil Hellmuth has become the Lebron James of the poker world. He has fewer and fewer fans every day, yet he keeps attracting more and more attention. Earlier this month, he was attracting attention for a book written about him called “Don’t Listen to Phil Hellmuth.” As you can imagine, the book doesn’t exactly paint Hellmuth in a flattering light since it’s basically preaching that you do everything at the table opposite of what he says.

Hellmuth’s latest attention-getting exploit involves sending out a Twitter post exclaiming that he’s a shoe-in to be on Dancing with the Stars. Hellmuth’s post read, “OMG! Phil Hellmuth (me!) on ‘Dancing with the Stars!’ Outrageous! Might make a fool of myself on worldwide television one more time.” From this post, we can tell two things: 1. He sounds like a 16 year-old girl who just found out her daddy was buying a new car for her sweet 16th birthday 2. There’s a strong possibility that Hellmuth will be on Dancing with the Stars.

And while you might think this is a good thing since he’ll draw Dancing with the Stars fans to poker, you’ve also got to consider how dorky he looks in this video (at around 2:00). In fact, he might do a better job of scaring people away from the game of online poker with his dancing “abilities.”

Of course, if you saw season 11 of Dancing with the Stars, he can’t do any worse than Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino, Bristol Palin or Kurt Warner. However, don’t expect the 6’5″ goofball from Madison to become the 12th champion of Dancing with the Stars either.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 25th December 2010

Are you bored to death on Christmas? You can always get away from annoying family members and sit down to some online poker action right here at Carbon Poker.

Carbon is currently running a number of great tournaments including satellites for the $50,000 Guaranteed, $7,500 Guaranteed and Bounty Freezeout tourneys. The Bounty tournaments are especially popular since you get extra money just for knocking other players out of the event. Depending on the tournament, you could win your buy-in back after knocking just two players out of the tournament. Every player you knock out of the tournament after that is pure profit!

If you’re exhausted financially after buying people lots of presents, you should also check out the freerolls that are running today. Just like every day, Carbon is running several freerolls that are loaded with prizes. Assuming you’re interested in playing in these free poker tournaments, just visit the Carbon Poker lobby, click on the “stakes” option, and look for tourneys marked “free.”

If you are more in the mood for cash games, you’ll find plenty of players on the tables right now at all of the stakes. And keep in mind that you’ll be earning points towards bonus money through the Carbon Money Tree. To participate in Carbon Money Tree, just log into your account, activate the Money Tree promotion in the player admin area, and hit the tables. As soon as you earn 100 VIP points in a day, you’ll be eligible to receive money.

Even if your Christmas totally sucks, you can make it worthwhile just by playing poker at Carbon.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 22nd December 2010

If there’s one played-out piece of poker strategy out there, it’s that you need to attack weak players. After all, fish are where everybody makes their money, so it only makes sense to go after them and get your piece of the pie. But here’s the thing about constantly attacking fish: these players are already going to make mistakes and donate money to you (and the rest of the table), which is why you can just wait for their mistakes. So instead of attacking the fish, here’s an idea – go after the good players.

Sound crazy? Sure it does because most of us have been taught to avoid good players and just keep picking on the bad ones. And there’s nothing inherently wrong with this strategy since you can profit from it. However, you can also make quite a bit of money by going after good players who don’t know you.

The reason why is because good players gain a lot of their skill by reading players through betting patterns and watching them play hands. The last thing they expect is for somebody to attack them with a marginal hand while trying to get them to lay cards down.

Oftentimes, the opposite happens when you try and push around a really bad player when they’re on a good hand; in these instances, fish don’t want to relinquish their good hand and so they keep calling raises. Contrast this to a good player who is willing to lay down a strong hand if it’s not the nuts so they can protect their stack. And it’s not because they’re scared of losing chips, but rather that they aren’t scared to let a good hand go.

So how can you spot a good player and begin attacking them? Well, it’s not always an exact science, but some small things you can do include looking at betting patterns, value betting ability, and the size of their stack. As soon as you get onto a new table, you should be looking at these factors.

Share
Posted by PokerPop on 22nd December 2010

Critical thinking in poker has often been described in levels, with the first level being when you consider your own hand. Once you’ve mastered the skill of deciding what hands are good to play and your odds in different situations, it’s time to graduate to the second level of thinking, which is considering what opponents have. Fortunately, reaching the second level of critical poker thinking isn’t too difficult. But it’s the third level – where you think about what an opponent thinks you have – that gets tricky.

The first thing you need to think about in regards to the third level is deciding what other players at the table think of your table image. Have you only played good hands with position? Have you shown the willingness to play second rate hands at showdown? Questions like these go into deciding how other players are viewing you at the table. For instance, if you haven’t played anything except for good hands with position, you may have to make lower value bets with great hands.

Also consider the stakes you’re playing at when deciding what an opponent thinks you have. At the lower stakes, simply making a large raise when an opponent’s flush draw misses could be enough to convince them that you’ve got better cards (even if you don’t).

One more thing to keep in mind as far as what other players think you have is your stack size. Based on how many chips you hold, certain moves can make you look strong, desperate, or like a bully. For example, if your stack is dwindling and you lead out with a large raise on a bad board, some players might think you’ve got nothing and that you’re just trying to steal.

So be sure to use your perceived image, stack size and the stakes you’re playing to guess what other players think you have.

Share